Options considerations

What options were considered in this study?

Based on previous studies and feedback from the public, the following strategies were included in this study:

  • Improved signal timing, priority and signal control
  • Improved corridor lighting
  • Changes to lane configuration at intersections
  • Priority for transit at intersections
  • Transit signal priority
  • Widening SR 305 to 3 or 4 lanes
  • Increased transit service
  • Parking changes in Winslow
  • New roundabouts
  • Bus rapid transit
    • Reversible transit lane
    • Dedicated northbound transit lane
    • Operating with general traffic
  • Separated pedestrian and bicycle facilities
  • New signals
  • Turn lanes for improved access at intersections
  • Left turn restrictions at intersections
  • Increased park-and-ride capacity
  • Extended HOV lanes
  • Grade separation at SR 305/Bond Road
  • Improved local street connections off SR 305
  • Crash barriers on shoulders

What options were not considered in this study?

Several options were removed from consideration based on recommendations in previous studies:

  • Light rail: previous study showed expected ridership within the 20-year planning timeframe would be too low
  • Monorail: not appropriate with suburban/rural nature of corridor, and very low cost effectiveness
  • Automated fixed guideway: not a tested technology for public transportation in highway corridor setting and not appropriate for level of expected ridership within the 20- year planning time-frame
  • Magnetic levitation: low community support, poor reliability in previous applications, and very low cost effectiveness
  • Commuter rail: poor integration with ferry terminal and negative safety and traffic impacts


Take notes as you go

Click the "Open Notes" button to start typing notes. You can transfer your notes to the comment form when you are done.